Over the past couple of days CySEC has come out with a number of announcements regarding fines charged to a number of CySEC regulated brokerages, with the most notable being the 50,000 Euro fine given to eToro and the 100,000 Euro fine given to the operators of UFX Markets. But today CySEC has made a public statement in which it defends the actions of the past couple of days:
‘CySEC wishes to stress that a settlement agreement DOES NOT in any way give a safe harbor to anyone from his obligations to comply with the relevant legislation. Following a settlement agreement, CySEC carries out new inspections to make sure that compliance has been achieved.
It is noted that the amounts due from settlement agreements are calculated as revenue (income) to the Treasury of the Republic and are not calculated as an income for CySEC.’
This statement seems to be hitting out against people who have made two of the following criticisms of CySEC recent behavior:
- That CySEC has been imposing such fines in a way to make up for a loss of governmental revenue to the body, something which LeapRate appeared to accuse CySEC of.
- That CySEC is offering safe harbor to brokerages which are breaching regulation in return for cash in the form of fines. Meaning that questionable brokerages are operating with their licences intact.
Just a little clarigication: the fine on eToro has been imposed in relation to alleged weaknesses in the early stages of eToro operation back in the year 2010. All weaknesses have been rectified as confirmed by CySEC. We are working in full cooperation with CySEC to make sure that we follow the highest compliance standards.
Again Thanks for your comment and I understand that your fine was for alleged weaknesses in 2010. I have no doubts that eToro are currently completely compliant with CySEC regulations now and it seems rather harsh from CySEC to back date a fine as such. I hope this fine from CySEC hasn't damaged your reputation to much and you bounce back from it.
Made To Trade